This argument may appear over subtle and refined; but is not in reality different from the reasoning of a judge, who supposes, that the credit of two witnesses, maintaining a crime against any one, is destroyed by the testimony of two others, who affirm him to have been two hundred leagues distant, at the same instant when the crime is said to have been committed.
so like we cannot/ should not hold the miracles in any regard of one religion because its is very well possible that in trying to establish the foundation for their system, they will try to refute others.. but in doing so they have done it themselves.. i guess?